Workflow

Meeting Summaries

Turn transcripts into clear updates with action items.

Overview

Meetings generate valuable information, but documenting decisions and action items is time-consuming. Claude Code turns transcripts into structured summaries, extracting decisions, owners, and follow-ups. Share summaries for confirmation before sending widely.

When to use

Use this workflow after team meetings, client calls, brainstorming sessions, retrospectives, or any discussion where decisions and next steps matter.

Step-by-step process

1

Upload transcript or meeting notes

Provide Claude with the raw meeting content—audio transcripts from tools like Otter.ai, Fireflies, or manual notes. The more complete the source material, the better the summary.

"Here's the transcript from our product planning meeting. It's about 45 minutes long and covers feature prioritization, timeline discussions, and resource allocation."
2

Ask for key decisions and action items

Direct Claude to extract the most important outcomes. Focus on decisions made, commitments given, and clarity on next steps and ownership.

"Extract: 1) Decisions made and who made them, 2) Action items with owners and due dates, 3) Open questions that need follow-up, 4) Key disagreements or concerns raised."
3

Generate a summary for stakeholders

Create a formatted summary appropriate for your audience—detailed for participants, high-level for executives, or structured for project tracking.

"Create two versions: A detailed summary for the team (with context and discussion), and an executive brief (just decisions and action items in bullet points)."
4

Send follow-ups and tasks

Use the summary to create task tickets, calendar reminders, and follow-up emails. Ensure everyone knows what they committed to and when it's due.

"Create a follow-up email thanking attendees, summarizing decisions, and listing action items. Also generate individual task descriptions I can copy into Jira."

Example prompts

Product planning session

"Summarize this 2-hour product roadmap meeting. Organize by: Features we committed to for Q1, Features deferred to Q2, Resource needs identified, Risks and dependencies flagged. For each committed feature, note the owner and target completion date."

Customer feedback call

"Analyze this customer interview transcript. Extract: Pain points mentioned (with quotes), Feature requests (ranked by emphasis), Workarounds they're currently using, Positive feedback about existing features. Include sentiment analysis."

Sprint retrospective

"Create a retrospective summary from these notes. Categorize feedback into: What went well, What didn't go well, Action items to improve next sprint. For action items, suggest owners based on who raised each issue."

Board meeting recap

"Generate an executive summary from this board meeting. Focus on: Strategic decisions, Financial approvals, Key metrics reviewed, Questions or concerns from board members, Follow-up items for management."

Expected outputs

Summary

Structured overview of the meeting organized by topic, including context, discussion points, and outcomes

Decisions

Clear list of what was decided, who made the decision, rationale provided, and implications going forward

Action items

Specific tasks extracted with owners, due dates, dependencies, and priority levels clearly identified

Follow-up questions

Open items requiring additional input, research, or decisions before work can proceed

Best practices

Use automated transcription services for accuracy—manual notes miss important details
Process summaries within 24 hours while context is fresh and attendees remember the discussion
Confirm action item owners and due dates before distributing—don't assume commitments
Include quotes for important statements, especially decisions or concerns—exact wording matters
Archive summaries in a searchable location—they become valuable historical context

Common pitfalls

Summarizing without understanding context

Solution: Provide Claude with meeting purpose and attendee roles. Context about what's been decided previously helps produce accurate summaries.

Missing implicit action items

Solution: Ask Claude: 'What action items are implied but not explicitly stated?' People often commit to things without using the words 'action item'.

Not validating summaries with participants

Solution: Send summaries to key participants for review before wider distribution. Misunderstandings are easier to fix early.

Pro tips

Create meeting templates by type

""Create a standard template for sprint planning summaries: Committed stories, Stretch goals, Blockers identified, Team capacity. I want consistent formatting across sprints.""

Link to previous decisions

""This is our third planning meeting for Project X. Reference decisions from the previous two meetings (attached) and note if anything has changed or been revisited.""

Generate status updates automatically

""Based on the action items from last week's meeting and this week's progress updates, generate a status report showing what's done, in-progress, and blocked.""

Related workflows